|
What
is it about Bach's music which is so.... music ? When I bought
my very first recording of classical music way back in 1987, it
was for the simple fact that it had the word "flute" on the cover.
I did not care for the two big names on the cassette, namely Mozart
and Bach. Completely bemused by this new experience of actually
buying a classical music recording, it simply made no difference
to me who they were.
I
fell in love with the Mozart Flute Concerto (No.2, K314) for a couple
of years, then got sick of it. On the other side of the tape was
Bach's Orchestral Suite No.2 in B minor. Whereas in those first
years I knew I loved the Mozart, I remember now how profoundly calm
I felt whenever I flipped the tape to the Bach side. It was not
ear candy, it was like meeting something or someone full of wisdom,
who respected your naivete yet was willing to speak to you. There
was something strangely full of fatherly love yet brimming with
detached intelligence.
Whenever
I listened to the Second Suite, something in my mind would constantly
be telling me, "Hey, this is serious music! Are you sure you're
old enough?" But a voice seem to also flow into my ear, just as
the vivid, liquid sound of the flute rolled and weaved around the
air. It said to me something without words, and today, when I think
about it, it is like trying to imagine Bach's voice. Every movement
is hypnotic, from the ominous opening Overture to the sad
Rondeau and Sarabande, the hectic Bourrée with
its chugging strings, the solemn but utterly graceful Polonaise,
with its swirling flute solos; to the dignified resignation of the
penultimate Menuet, and then the microcosmic grandeur of
the famous Badinerie. The whole makes me tremble with admiration.
The
Orchestral Suites, along with the Brandenburg Concertos and
other orchestral works, are some of the best examples of abstract
music at its most... music. How does one describe music for music's
sake? In Bach's music, when he is not word-painting, the essence
of musical thought seems to reach as perfect expression as possible.
No pictures, no stories, no individual personalities appear when
one listens to the music, although we can of course try to attach
pictures to them. To me, this partly explains the universal love
of Bach throughout the world; something in his art seems irrevocably,
even irresistibly human.
Right:
Detail from an anonymous painting,
first half of 18th century.
The
Suite, as I have noted elsewhere, is a French form - a collective
term for a set (hence "suite") of dances. It would be hard to actually
physically dance to these Orchestral Suites, for in fact they are
more like abstract musical essays on dance form; perhaps a Baroque
equivalent of "symphonic dances". When you listen to them, dance
not with your feet, but with your mind.
It
remains titillatingly unclear why or for whom Bach wrote these Suites
for. In Baroque Germany, composers called the form Ouvertüren,
a reference to the opening movement. When Jean-Baptiste Lully (of
Killed by Conducting fame) extracted the overture and selected dance
movements from his operas, he created the first Orchestral Suites.
And indeed, this "collect and play the best orchestral bits" idea
continues today.
Let's
use this idea. Perhaps we can see Bach's Orchestral Suites as the
individual movements he favoured, extracted from the operas he never
composed. What marvellous musical dramas they could have been. The
silent voices that ring in between these celebrations of C major,
D major and B minor, seem to be the very ones which deny us the
answer to the many questions we have on Bach's mysteriously (mostly)
unrecorded life.
And
yet, here we have today cantatas by the hundreds composed by Bach.
What would a Bach opera have sounded like?
Suite
No.1 seems to reside in some pastoral paradise, with its noble overture,
its skipping Gavottes, its gay Forlane and graceful
Menuets, concluding with a most dignified Passepeid.
Even as I write these descriptions, I experience two things: first,
my attempt to picture the music fails because the music really brings
to mind something too... universal to describe. Second, the adjectives
"noble", "skipping", "gay", "graceful" and "dignified" does nothing
to define the music, and yet these feelings I get listening to them
is exactly the essence I find in the music.
Left: J.S. Bach - 1746 portrait by E.G.Haussmann.
Suite
No.4 opens kingly, with trumpets and drums, striding grandly to
the fore. Momentum is vital in all dances, particularly in this
suite. Like the Overture of the Third Suite, the Bourrée
- one of my favourite movements - is a prime example of this momentum
in action; of different lines of music moving at seemingly different
levels and speeds. The Gavotte and Menuets are suffused
with relaxed grandeur. The universal portrait of Bach seems to revolve
before us, his face smiling in majestic beneficence.
Suite
No.3 is home to the famous "Air on the G-string". But before that
is an Overture demonstrating Bach's moving architecture at its best
- short trumpet motifs ricochet off chugging strings, while the
chinkling harpsichord dances around the micro-universe of turning,
spiraling lines.
The
Air is Bach at his most universal. This is no longer Baroque
music, it is again music at its most music. Somehow, when he wrote
this piece, when orchestras play it, Bach extended the spirit of
his composing hand into some place all humans come from. Somehow,
in composing it, Bach extended his music beyond 1685, beyond 1750.
Future generations have and will continue to hear it; past generations
are like Dante's Virgil, condemned as "Virtuous Pagans" who - alas
- lived too early to hear this music, and yet must have caught something
of its essence by simply being human. And yet, there is no Time
to this beautiful Air, no standard for which its Beauty can be judged.
It just is; could have come from the hand of a 16th century composer,
or the pen of a 20th century composer. It is neither ancient, Baroque,
Classical, Romantic, Modern - and yet it is music which could have
come from any of these periods. When I play it, it fills my room,
and like its namesake, becomes the very Air we all breathe.
If you wish to
Add a Comment to this article, please email your comments to classical@inkpot.com.
388:
22.1.1999 © Chia Han-Leon
All
original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the
Classical Editor
if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material.
|