|

Sergei Prokofiev
Piano Concerto No. 1-3
Martha Argerich, piano
Michael Tilson Thomas, conductor

Samuel Barber
Orchestral Works and Concertos
Leonard Slatkin, Charles Munch

Rimsky-Korsakov
Evgeny Svetlanov

Beethoven
Symphony No.9
Piano Transcription by Franz Liszt
Konstantin Scherbakov, Piano

Kronos Caravan
|
Naxos continue their traversal of contemporary American compositions
with another offering from the oeuvre of Philip Glass, with the
not-unexpected coupling of his Second and Third Symphonies. Both
have been recorded and released by longtime Glass advocate Dennis
Russell Davies with Vienna and Stuttgart orchestras on the
Warner-Nonesuch label (Symphony No.2 7559-79496-2; Symphony No.3
7559-79581-2) with various other couplings, but this is the first
time these works have appeared together, and on a budget label.
The symphonies here are presented in reverse order, with the shorter
Third Symphony (almost by half) presented first, although it has
four movements to the Second Symphony's three and is scored for a
chamber orchestra of just nineteen string players. By his own
admission, much of his early artistic impetus revolved around
subtracting elements from music to create his own unmistakable
idiom, just as in recent years he has been starting to look for
things to put back in.
The Third Symphony, which was written in 1994, is very unlike
the Glass most audiences would know from his previous works (which
some commentators have described, rather unfairly, as being similar
and repetitious to a fault). His capacity to surprise comes in the
main course in the second and third movements, the first movement
being a kind of short, slow-burning preface of sorts and the last
which recaps a bit of everything else which has just transpired.
Marin Alsop has been a strong exponent of American contemporary
works since her days at Yale, Juilliard and Tanglewood (where
Bernstein and Ozawa were her teachers), and it shows here as she
plumbs the low fathoms of this music with the Bournemouth. (Glass,
too, had been a Juilliard alumni, and in fact returns to his early
experimental polytonic roots in these symphonies.) Her rendition of
the second movement is largely comprised of frantic-sounding
compound meters, with the players grouped and playing like small
trios and quartets in a convoluted tapestry of textures kicking out
in all directions.
It is telling about Glass's orchestral writing that he manages
to make a smallish group of strings-only players sound profoundly
more complex and voluminous than they really are. (Ironically, this
idea also lies at the heart of the reductionism found in one branch
of the period music movement, where baroque and classical works are
played with minimal instruments, or even one, to a part, so as to
achieve maximum textual clarity. John Adams and Michael Nyman are
equally adroit with such part-writing, and no coincidence either
that they have been called "minimalists".)
Simple and Complex
Part of the paradox about Glass's music is that you can find
commentators and reviewers describing his music as both thematically
"simple" and "complex", and what's more, they'd both be right. Which
goes to show it really depends on what you're listening out for in
his deeply-textured tapestry of complex beats and polytonal sounds,
and how deeply into that one is able to plumb. The truth is, the
ostinato arpeggios and Alberti bass-lines one hears in Glass is no
different, note for note, from what you'd find in a Haydn symphony
or Mozart concerto, only that in Glass, they aren't used to support
melody but allowed to speak for themselves. Granted, it's not an
easy diet for audiences used to pre-digested servings of simple
melodies, chords and clearly lineated rhythms - but a bit of rough
fibre never killed anyone, either. (And to think, there's just no
explanation for the popularity of Ravel's Bolero.)
|
The third is a chaconne of repeated harmonic sequences over
which various instruments, including a prominently contoured solo
violin, dictate sinuously long-breathed melodic phrases which are
layered, one on top of the others. Alsop does not lead them towards
an overblown, Bolero-esque finale but opts for a coolly calculated
dissolution of the polytonal string textures, which makes perfect
sense given that she restarts the final section almost immediately
with a pulsing rhythm that drives the music to its indefatigable
conclusion.
The Second Symphony, which was completed only the year before
the Third, is a more recognizable flavour of Glass's OCD-tinged
minimalism, almost like sui generis Glass writ large for full
orchestral forces. Each of the movements lasts over thirteen
minutes, with the usual permutations through various repetitive
rhythms and harmonies, and like before, Alsop's inclination is to
allow the music to verbalize for itself, rather than to overindulge
in either extremity of whipping it too hard or slacking too much,
and she makes it all sound easier than it really is to hold these
thorny textures together.
Much of Glass's music has been written either for collaboration
in cross-media, in which sometimes the music hardly makes much sense
outside its context (like 1000 Airplanes On The Roof, The
Photographer or even Einstein on the Beach), or it has been written
for his own performance, whether on solo piano or for his
self-titled ensemble. It's surprising that only recently (in the
last ten years or so) that some of his concert hall-oriented works
are getting more play by other musicians than himself and his own
PGE, and when others do get the opportunity to rethink Glass in
their own fashion, the results are sometimes nothing short of
revelatory.
Here, for instance. Compared with the extant performances of
these two symphonies on Nonesuch, where Davies conducts (under the
imprimatur of the composer himself, no less) with a more visceral
quality in sculpting the ebb and flow of the arppegiated rhythms and
harmonies, Alsop brings more refinement and fluidity, helped by a
generous spacious ambience that, I'm sure, polishes some of the
coarseness off the sound.
On the other hand, more than just a cheaply-priced alternative,
Alsop brings a different approach to the table, one which is subtler
and persuasive in touch and pacing, but no less revelatory in terms
of bring out musical character. Both conductors manage to highlight
the detail and clarity impeccably from their respective orchestras,
so technically there's little to choose between them. However,
listeners who already own (and have enjoyed) Davies might find
Alsop's stylish reading instructive, even if - I'm guessing - she
hasn't intentionally set out to be didactic.
click here to return to top
|
In Singapore, classical music CDs may be bought most inexpensively from SING MUSIC, The
number to call is (+65) 6235 8960. The address is 304 Orchard Road #02-75 Lucky Plaza Singapore 238863. Simply mention the magic
words "The Flying Inkpot" and receive 10% off all purchases (except for nett items).Make a trip down, you won't regret it! |
No comments exist currently, do add your own!
This article is copyright © The Flying Inkpot Classical
Music Reviews http://inkpot.com/classical
All original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the
Classical Editor if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material.
|