Return to Classical Contents PageFind Old ArticlesContact WritersGo to Inkpot.com

This article was last updated on
8 April, 2003

More Stuff:


ReSSOnance III It's the Unofficial ReSSOnance Forum.

Singapore Symphony Orchestra Homepage Season Programme available here.

SISTIC Where you buy tickets for SSO concerts.


Do you have a website relating to classical music performance in Singapore? Tell us about it! Email classical@inkpot.com

 


19 November 2002, Tuesday
Victoria Concert Hall

Virtuosity - Abigail in Concert

Programme:

Robert SCHUMANN
Arabeske, Op. 18

Wolfgang Amadeus MOZART
Piano Sonata in D major, KV. 311

Franz LISZT
Liebestraume III

Fritz KREISLER/Sergei RACHMANINOV
Liebesleid

Moritz MOSZKOWSKI
Etincelles (Sparks)

Johann Sebastian BACH
Prelude and Fugue in B major, BMV 892

Richard RODGERS /Oscar HAMMERSTEIN
My favourite Things
March of the Siamese Children

Frederick Chopin
Andante Spianato and Grande Polonaise Brillante, Op. 22

Performers:Abigail Sin piano
NOISE RATING INDEX: 3 (Most of the underage audience were nodding off.)
The Noise Rating Index is a partially-objective measurement of pager and handphone blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits, intra-audience conversation and other mind-bogglingly inept noises emitted in the concert hall during actual performance of music. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.
This review has been kindly sponsored by Mrs Sin Yang Hong.
 
  
by Deanne Tan
 
Abigail Sin, at ten years old, is Singapore's youngest concert pianist. To date, she has given two concerto performances and, counting this one, three solo recitals. Her performances have received critical acclaim, and she is touted as a national asset which Singapore needs more of - "Young talents like Abigail are vitally important to sustain our cultural long march towards becoming a global city of the arts" (Mr Liu Thai Ker, Chairman, National Arts Council). Indeed, Abigail is the epitome of the bright young scholar who brims with talent and promise. She has won prizes in Mathematics and English, as well as having achieved a standard of piano performance comparable to that typically attained by those studying for a music degree at the end of their first year. Accomplishments aplenty, she seems more than well equipped to join our country's pool of artistic resources.

Abigail's character was a subject of my curiosity, her kind being so rare in our society. Upon some researching, I found her to be full of determination for the pursuit of excellence, especially artistic excellence. The number of performances and her repertoire attest to her active engagement in her craft. Her self-penned programme notes and memorized scripts added to my impression of her as a determined and focused performer. And, while I am no authority on the proper standard for child prodigies, Abigail's technique is impressive. Her drive displayed itself in her playing, and her commitment to practice was self-evident. That night, the stage of the Victoria Concert Hall was dominated visually by the minimal duo of piano and pianist, and the atmosphere was one of serious concentration. Presentation-wise, everything was in place.

I was impressed, and rather taken aback, by the ambitious programme. Mozart, Bach and Rachmaninoff, all in one night and by one ten year old girl? I was not just reacting from the heavyweight nature of the composers Abigail had chosen, but also the fact that they are all very different stylistically, each imbued with their particular artistic eccentricities. I was rather relieved to see the inclusion of the relatively light-hearted My Favourite Things and March of the Siamese Children, from Rodgers and Hammerstein's musicals, if only for the sake of the many children in the audience.

I was further impressed by Abigail's ability with the poetic and lyrical passages, particularly in the Lizst and Chopin pieces. Technical difficulty was no obstacle for Abigail; despite her child-sized hands, her fingers danced across the keyboard with seemingly little effort. Her technique was matched by her musicality and understanding of the two pieces. Regrettably, though, this was not always the case - it became evident in some other pieces that her interpretation was often outshone by her technical ability. Her rendering of Lizst's Liebestraume (Love's Dreams) perhaps lacked the emotional depth that would have brought out the complexities of the bittersweet nature of love. This, I felt, was the crux of the piece's beauty. It was also evident in the Kreisler/Rachmaninoff piece, Liebesleid (Love's Sorrow), that Abigail did not grapple with the wide emotional range that is especially characteristic of Rachmaninoff's music. The effect that I received was that of a sweet and naïve interpretation, charming in its innocence, and unique in its rendering - perhaps something that could develop into a distinctive style.

Unfortunately, my premonitions about the testing nature of the programme became increasingly justified as the night progressed. The performance of certain pieces was lacking, both technically and stylistically. Notably, Abigail's playing of Mozart's Sonata in D major KV 311 and Bach's Prelude and Fugue No 23 in B major BMV 892 missed the composers' points somewhat. Her playing was slightly shaky in the Bach, where it is so important to have clear enunciation and crisp phrasing to produce an ordered movement. Instead, the playing was messy to the ears and did not ring with clarity. Indeed, Bach is never easy to perfect; however this could have been a real feather in Abigail's cap if she could have just captured the spirit of the piece. Abigail showed more technical competence in the Mozart piece, and in some places her playing was wonderful - lively and brilliant. She was expressive and elegant at the right parts, even though they were marred by some clumsy transitions. My main misgiving, however, was with her flagging vigour and indifferent wit - both detrimental to the rich dramatic style of Italian opera. Without the proper spirit, the piece did not develop to its full buoyancy.

Abigail's ambition has taken her far, and she has attained a degree of technical competence over and above that of her peers. However, this very ambition may have clouded her focus on style, which makes all the difference between a lackluster and an interesting performer. Abigail had prepared an impressive number and range of works, but her playing did not carry much of her personal stamp. This lack of personal involvement in the music left the audience largely unmoved.

However, it is interesting to note that Abigail played with the verve and confidence of a seasoned virtuoso in My Favourite Things, which was arguably the most enjoyable piece of the evening. While Stephen Hough's transcription of the popular children's song had transformed it into an entirely different piece - one as technically demanding as a piano concerto - it retained the wistfully optimistic character of the original. And Abigail glowed throughout her rendition, not only with virtuosity, but with unadulterated joy. That moment, which flashed sporadically through the evening, was the truly captivating part of Abigail Sin. It would be this aspect of Abigail Sin which may be commanding our attentions in years to come.

Photos of Abigail Sin was obtained from the Abigail Sin and Caldwell Arts Entertainment website.

Deanne Tan sees that, while small hands may contain big ambitions, it takes more than ambition to keep a Mozart sonata from sounding like a Brahms' Lullaby

If you wish to Add a Comment to this review, please post your comments to classical@inkpot.com.

Last Concert Reviewed | Next Concert Reviewed

Return to Index Return to the Concert Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!

3.12.2002 © Deanne Tan

All original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the Classical Editor
if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material.