Return to Classical Contents Page Find Old Articles Contact Writers Go to Inkpot.com

This article was last updated on
7 November, 2002

More MPO:

MPO 14 Sep 2002
Mahler (by Tan Beng Ti)

MPO 7 Sep 2002
Beethoven, Sibelius, Brahms

MPO 24 Aug 2002
Kabalevsky, Tchaikovsky, Mussorgsky/Ravel

MPO 8 Jun 2002
Beethoven, Shostakovich

MPO 23 Mar 2002
Britten, Matsushita, Walton

MPO 19 Jan 2002
Handel, Haydn, Mozart

MPO 25 Aug 2001
Enescu, Rachmaninov, Stravinsky (Gala Opening at DFP)

MPO 5 June 2001
Debussy, Ravel, Hindemith, Wagner (S'pore Arts Fest)

MPO 4 June 2001
Mendelssohn, Brahms, Prokofiev (S'pore Arts Fest)

MPO 10 Nov 1999
Adam, Mahler (Singapore Tour)

MPO 9 Nov 1999
Nielsen, Sibelius, Tchaikovsky (Singapore Tour)

MPO 10 April 1999
Nordic Programme (at the Dewan Philharmonic, Petronas, KL)


 

The Malaysian Philharmonic Orchestra Official Website

For bookings, please contact the Dewan Filharmonik PETRONAS Box Office at 03-2051 7007 (tel) or 03-2051 7077 (fax).



Do you have a website relating to classical music performance in Singapore? Tell us about it! Email classical@inkpot.com

Malaysian Philharmonic Orchestra
14 September 2002, Saturday
Dewan Filharmonik PETRONAS,
Kuala Lumpur

Programme:

Gustav MAHLER
Symphony No. 9

Performer: Benjamin ZANDER conductor
NOISE RATING INDEX: 4 (During Zander's pre-concert talk, there was a grating sound that persisted from the loudspeaker, which only subsided after a few minutes. Constant coughing and uneasiness permeated the audience and marred pianissimos and intense periods. Perhaps the emotionally- charged piece was just to difficult to swallow?)

The Noise Rating Index is a partially-objective measurement of pager and handphone blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits, intra-audience conversation and other mind-bogglingly inept noises emitted in the concert hall during actual performance of music. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.
 
by Clarissa Lee
 

My first contact with Mahler, as a youth of sixteen, came from Symphony No.5 in C-sharp minor. At that point in time, I found it to be too pessimistic-sounding and intense for a ear accustomed more to the standard repertoire one surveys while learning classical music. Seven years down the line, I rediscovered Mahler while listening to an archived recording of Mahler's Symphony No. 1 under the BBC "Discovering Music Library Archive".

I admired his innovative way of interweaving his philosophy into his work, and use of various orchestral sections to iterate the motifs that serve to emphasise his theme for the movement. But the crowning experience came from witnessing it 'live'- Benjamin Zander executing to the audience a work that is the embodiment of the very essence and fully developed maturity of Mahler, his Ninth Symphony. It was definitely a very thought-provoking and soul-stirring experience for me, so much so that I did not even notice that the work featured for nearly 90 minutes, which speaks volumes for Mahler, Zander and the MPO.

The first movement, to quote Bruno Walter (the first conductor to ever premiere Mahler's Ninth) is:

"a tragic, strangely moving, noble paraphrase of farewell emotions. An unparalled hovering between the sadness of leave-taking and the vision of heavenly light (not floating fantasy, rather immediate emotions) lifts the movement into an atmosphere of transfiguration."1
I particularly liked the use of the three-tone motif to introduce the movement, the very mellifluous main theme (in D major) that would later take on variegated forms, the most prominent being the contrasting theme in D minor, and how it interspersed with the five climaxes scattered throughout this piece. The three-tone motif provided the binary of respite and anticipation, with its use of contrast, and together with the main theme, provided the platform for the climaxes to grow.

All these musical elements came together to achieve a memorable 'last stand' movement, where Mahler poured forth his agonies, philosophy, ruminations and constant battles that he had been having spiritually (being a Catholic Jew). Knowing his time on earth is almost up and pouring as much of his creative genius into this work as he could, fearing that this would be his last. As the orchestra rose and fell to the conductor's baton, the audience experienced the building up of euphoria, culminating in the loudest of all, the fifth climax.

Yet I didn't get to hear it with the MPO in a way I thought it would; nonetheless, the ending of the first movement by the harp provided a soothing, though uneasy, peace to the movement, with echoes of unearthly violins and violas still reverberating through our minds. This was also the longest movement among all the movements (equivalent in length to Beethoven's Fifth Symphony).

The second movement was very dance-like, a harmonic appeasement to the more foreboding first movement. There's also a subtle vulgarity in its slow formation to a waltz, played to near-perfection by the orchestra, with thrills in different transpositions prominent throughout this movement. The façade of light-heartedness is maintained whilst thoughts of impending death permeated the piece. It is said here that all of Mahler's dance styles are represented in this movement.

The third movement, to me, was more obliquely burlesque than the second, parodying perhaps the emotions and styles of the previous two movements. The orchestra gave it a subliminally acidic and satirical preface with capricious brass and woodwinds. There was also a beautifully serene string passage that spoke of desire for a beautiful dream-like world, unattainable, with the woodwinds counterpointing the strings, and the purposeful discordant phrasings of the clarinets with the oboes. It moved from furious urgency to melancholia, a realization (by Mahler) that all striving is grasping at straws. The piece moved from high tension and urgency to pensiveness, to a climax that abruptly ended at a point of frenzy.

In the final movement, we know of Mahler's foreboding that the end is inevitable. This was heralded by a very moving introduction by the orchestra. The woebegone-ness is seductive and the passion uninhibited. The uniqueness of this piece, to quote Floros, and to which I agree, is the idea of contrast being pushed to the limit; contrasting in their (major-minor) mode, harmonization, dynamics (with its ppp and fff within the same phrase) and character of expression.

We could hear in this movement Mahler's longing for his beloved dead child and longing for a wife he knew he would soon leave. The first violins and cellos provided the two-voice phrase of the main melodic theme. The principal violinist and first viola player alternated to provide the unforgettable melody of chamber music sound. Passage after passage was filled with unquiet rest and we were never allowed to forget the premonition of death. The soft passages on the harp, taken up by the violin, reminisced earlier passages and echoed the Kindertotenlieder, which was composed in 1904 around the time of his Sixth Symphony and shocked Alma Mahler, his wife (who exclaimed "For heaven's sake, don't tempt providence!"2)

In the finality, the orchestra once more transcended itself. The passion of the finale left me scarcely breathing as not to allow a note pass unnoticed. Zander brought Mahler back to live, and within this mechanistic and postmodernist century, its ecclesiastical elegies still rings true for me.

1 Floros, Constantin. Gustav Mahler: The Symphonies. Trans. Vernon Wicker. Wiesbaden: Scolar Press, 1994. 275.
2 Mahler, Alma. Gustav Mahler: Memories and Letters. Trans. Basil Creighton. Ed. Donald Mitchell. John Murray:London, 1973. 70.

 

Clarissa Lee learns the meaning of beauty in life through Mahler's last symphony

Photo of Benjamin Zander taken from the Benjamin Zander webpage

MPO 7 Sep 2002 | Next Concert

Return to Index Return to the Classical Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!
10.10.2002 © Clarissa

All original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the Classical Editor
if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material.