| The
novelty of a new acoustic hall, the sonic richness of the Klais organ and a flamboyant
entertainer combine to produce a splendiferous performance which one might not
otherwise associate with a classical music recital. Organ recitals are pretty
much a rarity in Singapore, and perhaps the opening of the Esplanade might serve
as an impetus for a new series of organ music as well as the development of local
music audiences. The spaciousness of the Esplanade
concert hall ambience - configured to maximum bloom for the evening - more than
matched the attractiveness of Carlo Curley's playing. Curley presented a free-ranging
musical cornucopia ranging from transcriptions showing off the colours of the
instrument to serious repertoire, interspersed with personal commentary. In his
ebullient, talkative fashion, he struck up an easy rapport with the mostly-neophyte
audience, which comprised quite a bit of what ad agencies would describe as blue-haired
prime target As and Bs with lofty disposable incomes.  Having
organists striking up a conversation with the audience certainly helps belie the
stereotype of organ recitals as dreary, droning affairs. It's not a new idea -
recalling Ingmar Bergman's 1978 "chamber movie", Autumn Sonata, we find
Liv Ullmann's character, Eva, saying that, "In the parish, I often play the organ.
Last month I had a musical evening; I played and talked about each piece." Curley's
approach to his playing was characteristically extrovert: huge splashes of over-the-top
gusto, with oases of surprising wistfulness every now and then. Such a zealous
approach worked well enough for the big gaudy numbers, though I think some players
would have taken a more mannered approach to the quaintly baroque Bachs and Buxtehude. Florid
mannerisms aside, Curley took a fairly predictable reading of the music. For the
most part, he drove the music forward with an excessive tendency for speed, rather
than letting it unfold at its own pace - even after adjusting one's tempo for
the transplantation of a non-organ work onto the organ. The seven-minute Entry
of the Guests from Wagner's Tannhäuser, for instance, was over
in three and a half in his hands, albeit substantially abridged. And it certainly
didn't justify rushing through MacDowell's To a Wild Rose and Massenet's
Méditation. The music wasn't given the time it needed to breathe
and the audience an opportunity to enjoy the aural landscape. Concerning
transcriptions: a comment about the Bach Sinfonia to Cantata No.29 here
might be instructive. This was originally the Praeludium movement of Bach's
own Third Violin Partita, rewritten as an opening instrumental flourish
for the Cantata (for a chamber group of two oboes, three trumpets, timpani, organ
and strings). Its popularity, as evidenced here, have led to its being borrowed,
adapted or otherwise reworked by others. Rachmaninov,
for instance, took three movements of the Partita, including the Praeludium,
and turned it completely into his own showpiece, pushing the violin's melody line
around like nobody's business, replete with Russian chimes, double-fisted chords
and his own flavour of counterpoint. Arthur Fielder and the Boston Pops have also
recorded an all-strings transcription of this work, which one might possibly perish
of a fatal overdose of Mantovanian schmaltz listening to it.
Post
hoc ergo propter hoc There is a Latin
proverb, post hoc ergo propter hoc, which literally means "after, therefore,
because of it." It is used to refer to a fallacy where A followed by B does not
mean that A was the cause of B. It is a fairly common misdirection of logic found
in propaganda, such as "More participation in cultural activities will make us
a more gracious people." At this point of cultural evolution, it would seem that
our audience behavior gives the lie to this statement. In fact, one might contend
that our societal graces, as such, are reflected in our culture (and not the other
way around). The historical Roman empire, for all its grandeur and decadence,
had a populist entertainment culture which included the bloodsport of gladiatorial
combats between slaves owned, as it were, by citizens of means and quality. Curiously
enough, present-day American culture also seems to have an affinity for
gladiators and wrestlers as well...
| We
need to remember that the original solo violin work was a study in the temperament
of the violin, with Bach using technical elements to reveal and intensify the
emotional effects of the musical argument, and not to detract from it. The work
returns full circle to its instrumental roots in Curley's own hand: a third-generation
realization of a transcription of a transcription. The
part of the solo voice was bright and complex-percussive, realized with spontaneous
phrasing and flounced through with all the exuberant devil-may-care effluence
of a show-stopper. (Not unlike the famous Moogmeister Wendy Carlos's own
synth arrangement of this work, given an identical electricized treatment on Switched-On
Bach 2000, Telarc CD-80323.) As Curley said in his introduction, "This piece
proves, beyond all doubt, that Bach invented rock-and-roll," and his rendition
served just exactly that. On the other hand, if there
can be too much of a good thing, it was his habit of pandering to the audience
by playing excessive rallentandos at the end of every loud work. (Although
I will forgive the rallentando at the ending of the Bach BWV 564 juggernaut,
coming as it does so abruptly after a mellow Adagio.) But otherwise, Curley
never belabours a point - full marks for impeccable technique and imaginative
registration - which the neophyte audience seemed to enjoy immensely. Apart
from an obsession with the dulciana in the Solo division, his selection
of instrumental shades and timbres was resourceful and stimulatingly varied (if
somewhat predictable), from soft stops for the Wild Rose and Londonderry
Air, to rotund, fire-spitting Bombardes in the marches by Wagner and
Saint-Saëns that closed their respective halves of the programme. Purists
might well shudder at the quasi-instrumental sounds simulated by the organ, but
I think the more important thing is how much of the spirit of the original
which Curley captured. There is no denying that he
did attempt to recreate much of the nuances of the music, such as the comtemplative
exposition of the Massenet Méditation. But there is just no getting
around the fact that this intermezzo is an intimate tete-à-tete
between the solo violinist and the listener, whereas the organ's voice, however
hushed, is still a demagogue bellowing from the pulpit. The less-programmatic
pieces were, I felt, more successful in the execution: Stanley's short Concerto
and Guilmant's brilliant reworking of the popular Aria from Handel's Concerto
Grosso Op.6 No.12.  No
surprise, then, that the cornerstone of the evening's programme, for me at least,
came in the second-half with the Langlais, Buxtehude and Franck's Fantaisie.
The Franck was a last-minute change from the originally-planned Mozart F minor
Fantasy, K 608. (Curiously, the Fantaisie comes as the first of
Trois pièces of 1878; the third item of this set is a Pièce
héroïque in B minor.) The other-worldly
figurations of the Langlais immediately provoked the lady seated next to me to
remark to her companion, about three bars into the music, "Oh dear, it's
modern." (As if the rest of us were deaf.) The Buxtehude, Curley's "surprise piece",
was a florid Baroque miniature, and the set was rounded off with a exquisite and
insightful exploration of Franck's Fantaisie - a gamut of emotions running
through different sections of the music, each imbued by Curley with its own individual
character, and yet forming part of the whole. Curley's
day at the office was rounded off the evening with a pair of encores: a Wurlitzer-style
rendition of John Philip Sousa's The Liberty Bell March, which elicited
knowing murmurs from the audience, followed by a pert little Adagio, written
originally for two pianos by the Czech composer Dušek, transcribed for keyboard
by Curley's sometime mentor, Sir George Thalberg-Ball. A not-inconsiderable crowd,
at Curley's invitation, then queued in the foyer to get autographs and shake hands
with the charismatic orgelmeister. A valedictory display of the organ that
lived up to its billing in every way - albeit one marred by poor audience behavior.
Organic
Matters Charismatic and engaging, Carlo Curley
is an evangelist whose lifelong mission is "to establish the organ at the forefront
of musical instruments". His reputation for having the most flamboyant signature
in the classical circuit is well justified (matched only, perhaps, by that of
Evelyn Glennie's.) Benjamin Chee finds out more behind the man famously dubbed
"The Pavarotti of the Organ". What are your impressions
of the Klais in the Esplanade? It is magnificent ! I's a very colourful
instrument, capable of playing from very soft colours to a huge sound, like the
Second Coming in Panavision. That's why Mozart described it as "...the king of
all instruments." The organ has a bit of everything in it. What
is your imperative in presenting these concerts? I think we organists
are a rare breed. It's not that easy to find many people who do this for a living,
not counting those in academic or church positions, I mean. I have all the respect
for church music, but it can give people a completely wrong impression of what
organ music can be. [mimics yawn] We can take the boredom out of organ music,
and yet keeping it properly dignified. By this, you
mean... Traditionally, organs have been associated with the church. We
used to say that in church, organs are used to "play you in and play you out,"
that is, to accompany hymns, at weddings, funerals... Now, I fully appreciate
the role which organs play in the church, and the influence of the church on organ
music, Bach, Buxtehude, and all that. I respect that dignity, but at the same
time, I feel that it also deserves a place at the forefront of the concert hall.
I like to take the core of the organ out, and let the audience see the flight
deck, where I'm, like, flying the Boeing 747 Jumbo Jet on stage. So
there is an element of showmanship involved. I once watched Liberace,
the consummate entertainer, in this huge complex with thousands and thousands
of people in the audience. He had, on each one of his fingers, this huge chunk
of jewellery. There must have been like five million dollars of rings of jewels
on his hands, the Sultan of Persia could not have matched his collection of kitsch.
But if you took away all the beads, fur, sequins, boas, feathers, rings and jewels,
you still couldn't hide the talent. I mean, he could play - he played Rachmaninov's
Third Concerto, plus a bit of the cadenza, with the fat diamond rings on
his fingers. Now I could not ever play like that - I don't even wear a watch,
because it throws my balance off - but that man had prodigious technique, I tell
you that, even if he chose to play what I'd call "bodega music." But if my recordings
sold one tenth of what he sold, I would be very satisfied indeed. Could
you comment on the programme for the "Organ Extravaganza"? They let me
to put together a programme to take the yawn factor out of it, but I've also kept
a bit of the standard favourites. But it's also going to be a serious repertoire,
slightly eclectic, but there's also something for everyone: Massenet, Mozart,
Bach. And I always like to start with something quiet, almost inaudible, because
it forces the audience to listen very carefully right from the start. Sometimes
it's the music that sells itself. That's right ! Now I'm playing on Saturday
evening - that puts me up against, how many channels do you have on cable in Singapore
? Forty ? Fifty ? And there's Saturday night football ! I've heard that so far
we've sold about seventy-five percent, and I hope that with a push, we can get
a hundred percent for the night. This is also a new hall, and people will be interested.
What are your thoughts on transcriptions, given that
quite a few items on your programme are not original music written for the organ?
Transcriptions will only add to and increase the huge amount of music out
there which have been written for the organ. A lot of people hear classical music
not in their original forms, but as an arrangement. I once heard Horowitz play
Schubert's Erlkönig in transcription - it helps if you know the story,
and I did - I was literally on the edge of my seat as the king catches up with
the boy... [tips couch forward precariously] That Steinway must have bled to death,
he was hammering the keyboard so hard ! I will never forget that concert as long
as I live. I've noticed - part of the programme seems
to involve a number of blind composers - Jean Langlais, John Stanley, Handel,
and Bach, in his last year... [looks at programme] I didn't think of it like
that, of course, but you're right. It was not intentional, I assure you, it just
happened that way. You have made a number of musical
recordings for some of the big labels, but they're impossible to find.
I have done a number of recordings for Decca, which have sold a ton. But for some
inexplicable reason, they've deleted it after two years, even though they were
selling well. They ought to reissue them... But that's why I've also decided never
to record for a major label again - not unless it's a special project - because
after two years, poof ! Gone. I also had a book published by HarperCollins
in 1997, and after three years, they took it off the shelves, I don't know why.
Photo of Carlo Curley was obtained from the
Carlo Curley website.
Benjamin Chee is
not mad north-north-west, although he sometimes cannot resist making obscure allusions
to Shakespeare. (And "The West Wing".) If
you wish to Add a Comment to this review, please post your comments to classical@inkpot.com.
Last
Concert Reviewed | Next
Concert Reviewed All
original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the Classical
Editor if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material. |
|