|
OVERALL NOISE RATING: 1 (more rustling plastic.) The Noise Rating Index is a partially-objective measurement of pager and handphone blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits, intra-audience conversation and other mind-bogglingly inept noises emitted in the concert hall during actual performance of music. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.
by Johann D'Souza & the Nutcase
Not
the usual sort of character one portrays the Russian pianist as, especially
if one had just been to the recent piano festival and listened to Nikolai
Lugansky Well I remember hearing what someone said after the concert, "If you did not like what you saw - you should have closed your eyes". From the musical point of view, Gavrilov was everything I longed to hear in the Rach 3. I have always felt that a certain amount of irrational rationality had to be used in the approach to tackling the Rach 3 and he did just that.
Going into this concert I did have some pre-conceived ideas of what to expect, thanks to a Hungarian conductor-friend of mine, Arpad Joo. He mentioned to me that Gavrilov was one who could transcend into a certain sense of heightened tension, transmitting that into the conductor and audience, which no pianist has ever done. From the opening notes, the atmospheric tension was immediately conveyed; with compelling insight Gavrilov unleashed his probing intelligence. There were some harsh moments, especially when played together with the orchestra, but he seemed to be well above even in the orchestral fortissimos. Okko Kamu was in his element and seemed to have clicked with the pianist well, directing with pinpoint accuracy.
There seemed to be this blatant brilliance in every facet of Gavrilov's playing, be it his chordic displays, pedaling, runs or just his bringing out the melodic line in the left and right hands. There was always this extravagance of dramatic display, with the lifting of the hands high up in the air, but all this done with magnetism and excitement. The entry into the cadenza of the first movement was to me the most intense feeling I have ever got at the VCH coming from a pianist. His ability to hold out the opening chords long enough to bring the audience in with him on this journey, and then the Niagara-like torrents which come after, were to me pure dramatic wizardry. Every note clear, balanced and thought out. The equality of his fingers were awesome and the tackling of the Ozzia cadenza was a model of precision. Sitting at the piano in a Glenn Gould-like position, it is no wonder why he suffers from back problems (that was the reason he cancelled his last concert to Singapore), but if one questions his sitting position he seemed to get the maximum out of each individual note in this slouched position. The second movement was well set by Okko Kamu but Gavrilov did make light of the tension by folding his legs, slouching on to the front of the keyboard and even indulging in a little side conducting at a certain point. But when his fingers opened the second movement solo, the opening chord said it all: his Merlin touch moved you back into the music. My only slight reservation would be his tendency to be a bit bright at fortissimo, but made up for it in the pianissimo portions of the piece. At age 45 Gavrilov seems to have so much going for him, his playing reminding me of the young Richter with all the flamboyance and energy of that great pianist. Gavrilov seemed to love ever minute of it as seen by the way he engaged the audience in his flight to bring the music across. After the concerto, as promised by the persistent rumours - thanks to Benjamin Chee from the Friends of the SSO for asking him to play Bach - Gavrilov graced us with the first six preludes and fugues, plus No.8, from Book 1 of The Well-Tempered Clavier to commemorate the death of Johann Sebastian Bach. The impromptu recital began about 15 minutes later to a crowd of "music lovers". It would have started a bit earlier had Kwai Sum (president of the NUS Piano Ensemble), whom he requested specifically as page turner appeared sooner. ( I did speak to Kwai Sum later - he said he had no idea he was going to be picked - but it was a rare honour indeed).
I did not look behind me but judging from the applause it must have been about 80% full [Yes, it was at least 80-90% full - Ed.] - only fools went home, in my opinion (Opps… sorry, people with good reasons). From the first prelude, every note was well articulated, ornaments clearly thought out and polyphony and phrasing lyrical but not too indulgent. Gavrilov has strong fingers with the ability to do trills with the 3-4 and 4-5 fingers which from my seating position allowed me to see this first hand. Following by score (thanks to Derek who said he had a premonition to bring the score - why he did not know), I could see that his contrapuntal playing was awesome: every voice could be heard and pedaling was immaculately done. The fugues were never aggressively exuberant, in fact there was an emotional gravity in the last fugue of No.8 which he said was based on a Russian theme and jokingly said that it could have been dedicated to Russians. His range of colors displayed a Catholicity of repertoire, there was nothing careless about his interpretation. After the performance, for those who had an opportunity to speak with him, we asked him about his recordings, his contract with EMI and what was in store. Well if you liked his Preludes and Fugues, there may be a chance in the not-too-distant future of catching it on DVD as he has already filmed it in England... -
Johann D'Souza How brave it is for Okko Kamu and the SSO to stage Sibelius' most "austere" symphony, the Fourth, in a Gala Concert - and to open that concert with it, AND place it next to a quintessentially Romantic piano concerto! The contrast was stark indeed - if anything, the symphony proved to be the low point of the concert - which is not surprising at all. At its premiere, at which Sibelius himself conducted, the end of the work was greeted with silence (and bewilderment) by the stunned audience. For me, the performance of the Fourth is a milestone in itself - five or six years ago, I would not have believed that the SSO was ready to play any of Sibelius' symphonies beyond the Second- they simply did not have the precision and the maturity to do so. At that time, there were even those who said that the SSO could not play all Beethoven's symphonies equally well. But today, I am proud to say that in the space of the Inkpot's existence, I have heard the SSO play all but the Third Symphony - this is a dream come true for me. To begin with, I was surprised to see that Kamu had fielded a very large orchestra for what is considered the most chamber-like of the seven symphonies of Sibelius. Six desks of 1st Violins were at stage edge. The result takes a small toll on the transparency of the score - the tone sounds a little too Romantic. There is an upper limit to the range of colours evoked during the performance - a lot in the middle was missing. But that said, I must highlight the fine playing of the celli (evocative textures) and the woodwinds (a frosty Finnish landscape of bird calls). Though the string orchestra sounds a little lacking in personality, it did produce some fierce and chilling sounds in the third movement. Kamu handled phrasing well, as well as the important pedal work. Accentuated phrases were produced with just the right amount of utterance and force, without overdoing them. Progression of material, so crucial to Sibelius' organic symphonic development, was handled with sensitivity. I liked the way Kamu went without a break between the first and second movements, as well as the last two. The final movement was the most coherently argued, with very well coordinated/constructed integration of the music. Some sections may have been overcooked, too thick and gooey; but in the end, the heartbreak of the ending bars, that forlorn orchestral sigh, was very effective. The audience was quiet and attentive throughout (well, even at row M, I did not see anyone nodding off), and made me wonder how newbies to the work felt about it. One person who appreciates the work that I do know of is the author of the excellent notes in the programme booklet - composer John Sharpley. "Beauty portrayed as austere, noble, wondrous, terrifying and rapturous settles deep into the soul", he describes. I couldn't have put it any better. -
The Inkpot Sibelius Nutcase
Chia
Han-Leon and Johann
D'Souza were two of the lucky people who managed to find themselves
copies of the underprinted programme booklets.
743: 1.8.2000
©Johann D'Souza, ISN Explore the Flying Inkpot They're
Alive!
Bit deadish: Other
Resources at The Flying Inkpot
|
Do you have a website relating to classical music performance in Singapore? Tell us about it! Email classical@inkpot.com |