Return to Classical Contents Page Find Old Articles Contact Writers Go to Inkpot.com

This article was last updated on
21 November, 2001

More Stuff:


ReSSOnance III It's the Unofficial ReSSOnance Forum.

Singapore Symphony Orchestra Homepage Season Programme available here or...

SSO Current Season

SISTIC Where you buy tickets for SSO concerts.


Do you have a website relating to classical music performance in Singapore? Tell us about it! Email classical@inkpot.com

Singapore Symphony Orchestra
10 November 2001, Saturday
Victoria Concert Hall

Gala Concert

Programme:

Arnold SCHOENBERG (1874-1951)
Five Orchestral Pieces, Op.16 (1949 version)

Claude DEBUSSY (1862-1918)
La Mer (Three Symphonic Sketches)

Ernst BLOCH (1880-1959)
Schelomo (Hebrew Rhapsody for Cello and Orchestra)

Charles Camille SAINT-SAËNS (1835-1921)
Cello Concerto No.1 in A minor, Op.33

Performers: Lynn HARRELL cello
SHUI Lan conductor
NOISE RATING INDEX: 4 (cough epidemic with a huge whopping one resonating clearer than any other instrument in the hall, numerous kids who made their boredom audibly known, and the usual appearances by mobile phones.)
The Noise Rating Index is a partially-objective measurement of pager and handphone blasts, 9pm and 10pm watch beeps, coughing-during-the-pianissimo-bits, intra-audience conversation and other mind-bogglingly inept noises emitted in the concert hall during actual performance of music. It is measured on a scale of 0 to 5, in increasing annoyance.
This review has been kindly sponsored by the Singapore Symphonia Co. Ltd
 
   
by David Chew
 

To those who missed this concert, regret now. And regret hard. Or pray Lynn Harrell comes back to our island real soon. Short of a standing ovation, he practically brought the house down with his performance in the second half of the programme.

The concert began with Arnold Schoenberg's Five Pieces for Orchestra, a rather strange selection in view of the rest of the programme. In fact, it got most of the audience flipping through the programme booklet as many tried their best to appreciate it.

With atonality, Schoenberg had done away with a thematic idea and rhythmic constraint. This piece, along with the Three Pieces and Six Little Pieces for Piano, tends to be short statements of a single extreme musical state, thus warranting the term 'expressionist'.

The first piece, Vorgefòhle ("Premonitions"), had the sufficient 'imminent' feeling, in view of the impending First World War. However, the SSO's playing lacked the momentum needed for the repetitive and 'rapid fluctuations' to have any desired effect. In fact, to say this piece sounded like it lacked inspiration would not be too far from the truth. The second piece Vergangenes ("Yesteryears"), is a more accessible piece that makes use of obvious repetition, and this much was clear from their playing. However, again, it was less than convincing.

Farben ("Colours"), the third piece was supposed to be, as described in the programme booklet as "aurally fascinating" failed to deliver exactly that. The solo chord that opened the piece was unsteady, as if unsure of its place or its importance. Peripetia ("Change of Fortune") and Das Obligate Rezitativ ("The Obligatory Recitative"), the fourth and fifth pieces respectively, fared much better. In fact, musical texture was more clearly brought out in the dramatic Peripetia, with the orchestra working easily towards a cresending climax. On the whole the piece was marred by being muffled by the hall's acoustics, if anything else.

Next up was Debussy's La Mer, in what could be described as an affectionate rendition, lyrical at times and more convincing than the first item. Lan Shui gave it his best, and his conducting of this piece must be commended for his feeling and passion of the piece. Likewise the harpist and the cello section, which made the piece more brilliant with their respective parts. From Dawn to Noon on the Sea had a wonderful build up, with the muted English horn adding a sense of romanticism to the beginning of dawn. The conclusion of a mid-day noon sun over the magnificent sea however failed to achieve a certain grandiose effect.

Play of the Waves was delightfully rendered, with the harp glissandi portraying the rise and fall of the waves so effectively, though this movement could have taken on a more overall graceful tone. Dialogue of the Wind and the Sea, rising from depths of storm to the climax was the orchestra at its best in this piece. Nature's fury echoed and by the percussions, the strings and brass gusty and threatening, my first thought when the piece ended was that this could be one of the SSO's best kept secrets. A more French reading of the piece i.e. slower at certain parts, a more languid reading would have made it an excellent piece.

Then came Bloch's Schelomo, with Lynn Harrell taking centrestage. Laden with emotion, it is a piece only a cellist who 'feels' the piece can pull off. To mention that Lynn Harrell's playing of this brought tears to eyes of some in the concert hall certainly says enough. The overwhelming emotional range of the piece was heightened by Harrell's cello singing its way mournfully through the piece, the strong trumpets exploding in uncontrolled emotion, with the overall confidence and prowess of the orchestra's playing being surprising, considering the performance of the earlier two works.

Harrell's level of concentration and intensity impressed many, as he took the lamentation of the piece across the scales, from the highest to the lowest, every pull of the bow rich with voice and strength, the music coursing through his body as he moved with the music, feeling every sorrow in the piece. Harrell's passionate cello melody, simple and drawing, contrasts with the complex orchestral background. The piece concludes with a quiet coda, which Bloch intended to be "a quiet acceptance of the sorrow that comes with knowledge." And sorrow was the note Harrell ended on.

In contrast to the melancholic and dark Schelomo is Saint-Saëns' Cello Concerto No.1 in A Minor, Op.33. Lively and played almost to the point of being perfectly orchestrated, both Harrell (left) and the SSO were excellent in complementing each other's playing. The first movement saw Harrell in top form, coursing through the octaves effortlessly, with the cellist clearly relishing every moment of the lively first movement, his face lit up with the brilliance of the piece. The second movement, having a court-like dance melody to it, is gentle and allowed Harrell to show the sensitivity of his playing.

A Glimpse of Lynn Harrell
- An Interview by David Chew

The third movement repeats the opening melody, interspersed with sensual solos by the cello, which then picks up in tempo and melodic complexity, ending with the listener feeling much pleasure at the 'effortless beauty' of this piece. At no point here does the orchestra nor Harrell allow one to breathe as they take it higher and higher and finally conclude to rapturous applause from the audience. Harrell's soulful playing, his sheer virtuoso when gliding up and down the passages of notes, along with his thrilling use of vibrato to exceptional effect only affirmed his effect on audiences: "Magical…", as a fellow concert-goer seated next to me noted breathlessly amidst the thunderous applause.

Of course we expected an encore. This audience was shouting for it. And Harrell obliged with two, the first a transcription of Chopin's Nocturne in C# Minor. In the first, we were reminded again of how Harrell makes his cello sing, as this time, unaccompanied, the mellow and ripe sound filled the hall, his notes full and sensitive, especially his double-stops, which gave so much depth and feeling to the piece one could imagine a opera voice doing the singing instead of a cello. The second piece (which I am unable to identify - "Montini Gauvet"?), short and sweet, bursting with its lively melody and cheer, demonstrated how much Harrell clearly enjoys playing for an audience. His infectious warmth can be heard through his playing and indeed brought a few laughs and smiles at the end, and an end to what was truly a magical night.

 

DAVID CHEW gets gushy about few things in life, cello music being one of them (oysters being another), and begs the pardon of the reader…

If you wish to Add a Comment to this review, please post your comments to classical@inkpot.com.

Nov 9's Concert Reviewed | Next Concert Reviewed

Return to Index Return to the Classical Index!...
or Visit the Inkvault archives!

8xx: 11.11.2001 © David Chew

All original texts are copyrighted. Please seek permission from the Classical Editor
if you wish to reproduce/quote Inkpot material.