imagemap

STAR WARS


Rebecca Wan

Produced by: 20th Century Fox / Lucasfilm
Written and Directed by: George Lucas
Main Cast: Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker), Carrie Fisher (Princess Leia), Harrison Ford (Hans Solo), James Earl Jones (voice of Darth Vader)
Rated: PG
Length: 125 min

SNORE WARS

I know SPACE BALLS wouldn't have been as funny as it was without its parodic model STAR WARS -- it probably wouldn't even have been made. It *was* made, though, and nowadays it's hard (for me) to even think about Darth Vader without picturing an asthmatic Rick Moranis in an oversized helmet stumbling around and walking into things.

Not for me the maudlin tropes of a generation of star-struck reviewers who wax lyrical about what they were doing when they *first* saw STAR WARS. Unlike many critics who've enthused about the nostalgic ride this film took them on (they must not have had very exciting childhoods), I didn't watch STAR WARS on the big screen. I watched it on video three or four years after it came out, and I've watched it a number of times on television, along with its two sequels THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK and THE RETURN OF T HE JEDI.

You'd think I'd have *wanted* to watch it on the big screen, rushing out, like the Fox trailers have been telling me, to "see it again, for the very first time," in its glorious remastered/re-digitalized/re-morpherized/re-whatever state, but I didn't. May be it's a Singaporean thang but it makes sense to me: who wants to pay $7 for a movie she's already watched three times?

Unfortunately for those of us with boyfriends who read Star Wars novelizations (and who insist on watching at least one out of the re-released trilogy) that's exactly what STAR WARS is, minus the pseudo-mythologizing, mega-merchandizing, ooh-aah-an-extra- scene-with-a-big-computer-generated-slug hoopla. The most amazing thing about seeing the film in its original widescreen format is realizing, despite the immense desire to bow to pressure and be awed, how mediocre STAR WARS is. Taking into account the hea ps of writing on how it revolutionized film-making, the film industry and just about the whole entire decade, it still takes an effort to sit through the re-released STAR WARS and not think of how trite the script is when compared to an average episode of something like Babylon Five, or how uninspiring its ideas are (What, after all, is this Force, other than some Americanized New-Age Bull-Crap version of the Judeo-Christian Holy Spirit?).

It's also hard to detach much of the STAR WARS "legacy" from the movie itself. For example, it was difficult to watch the scene where Luke Skywalker (Mark Hamill) zooms, in his X-Wing, towards that one weak spot in the Empire's Death Star, without thinkin g of the ratty Star Wars computer game I used to play on my Mac. Nor was it easy to banish pictures of Rick Moranis and Bill Pullman duelling with their groin-centred light sabers in SPACE BALLS when watching Darth Vader confront the robed Alec Guiness in the first film of the trilogy. The former scene is infinitely more enlightening, as are many other parodic scenes from SPACE BALLS. In another, a rabbit-earred John Candy (Mel Brooks' inspired version of Chewbacca: "I'm a Mog. Half man, half dog. I'm my own best friend!") tells Bill Pullman (or is it the other way around?) that they will meet again, hopefully, in "Space Balls 2: The Search For More Money."

In other words, perhaps (for me) STAR WARS has been a victim of its own success, spilling over into an unbelievable amount of multimedia schlock and resurfacing, throughout the last two decades, in countless iconic cliches: Carrie Fisher in a bagel hairdo , the unforgettable (and endlessly quoted) "Force" schtick, bad novels and TV serials (Battlestar Galactica, anyone?). For someone who grew up in the post-STAR WAR decades, nurtured by the merchandizing, blockbustery clutches of a Hollywood revolutionized by STAR WARS -- or maybe just for me -- it was hard to behave as one feels one is expected to at the re-release of STAR WARS (Note to STAR WARS enthusiasts: DON'T KILL ME, I'm only a mere Slacker with too much web space on her hands). In the end, the ori ginal seems no less tacky, or less contrived, than its movie tie-in offspring.

For those of us who learned about STAR WARS (and what it was supposed to mean) from without, it must surely be easy to wonder what the big deal was (and still is), about a bunch of realistic-looking spaceships, starscapes, rubbery aliens and a louder-than -necessary soundtrack blasting a by now over-exposed theme into the ears (it's a pity to waste good THX on Mr John bloody "are 90 thousand violins *enough* for the string section" Williams, but there you have it). Don't get me wrong, I'm all for rubbery a liens and great-looking starships and space battles myself, but a good hour of Star Trek: The New Generation delivers just as well.

Still, the revised edition of STAR WARS isn't *bad*. It's a lot of fun, and, for me at least, most of the humour remains intact, despite its third or fourth watching. Whether an intergalactic smuggler pursued by a gargantum gangster mollusc or a 1930s arc heological adventurer, Harrison Ford's perpetual unwillingness to get involved and goodhearted cynisim still saves the day from the corny binary oppositions set up in the film (in general, British accents=bad/silly/Empire, American=good/rebels; White=good ; Black=bad). Skywalker's motley posse is still funny: the mindless fussing of C-3PO, the charged bickering between Leia and Solo, the childlike insistence of R2-D2.

In the end, watching STAR WARS was a little like looking at John Travolta in the disco period and wondering what people were thinking in the first place. Oh wait, but disco's in again, isn't it?

The Flying Inkpot Rating System:
* Wait for the TV2 broadcast.
** A little creaky, but still better than staying at home with Gotcha!
*** Pretty good, bring a friend.
**** Amazing, potent stuff.
***** Perfection. See it twice.

Rebecca Wan supposes that everyone is just going to hit the "comments" button now and blast her to itty bitty little critic bits. Just remember that everything she said in this article is IHHO ("in her humble op inion") only, so damnit, get a life.



Read other movie reviews at the Inkpot

Other film reviews by this writer can be obtained from the InkVault by doing a key word search with this writer's name.
Other film reviews by other writers can also be obtained from the InkVault through key word searches.

Explore the Flying Inkpot

They're Alive!
Concert Reviews

Bit deadish:

Other Resources at The Flying Inkpot
Zine Scene Newslinks Movie Resources Booklinks
Chantelle L'amour Letters Page Inkvault Poetry
Home

Readers' Comments


From: Lee Kin Mun (leekm@singnet.com.sg)

Hey, you played that crappy Star Wars game on the Mac too? It was a blast (pardon the pun) on a Mac SE. Hey, I know it was crappy but it was the only Star Wars game on the Mac at the time. As for the movie, it was fun for me. Sorry abt the effect it had on you but hey, you gotta use the Floss, Luke, use the Floss.

From: Chantelle Lamour ()

Re: Star Wars review Muahahahahahahahahahaha.......

From: darth vader (darkforce@deathstar.com)

fuck you bitch! i am your father. It is your fucking destiny to like star wars.

From: jonny_f (jonny_f@geocities.com)

I heartily agree. Star Wars was the biggest waste of money since I went to see Batman and Robin. The entire film was so boring. So was Empire Strikes Back, who wants to see a green muppet for that amount of time when people could be shooting other people and things could be blowing! Return of the Jeid is by far the best of the bunch, it's got excitement from beginning to end. No, the ewoks are nowere near as irritating as Yoda.

From: Sledge (shammer@one.net.au)

It won 7 acadeny awards, launched Harrison Ford big-time (Note : he has been in the most number of blockbuster films, Star Wars being his first break-through!), made George Lucas an icon to many fans, Made millions of dollars, spawned popular toys, comics, and book, have been revamped using THX, given a Directors Cut, is having prequels released that are already being cheered across the world even though they aren't made yet, AND was the ground breaker for special effects company Industrial Light And Magic who have done the specials for such movies as The Abyss, Terminator 2, Forrest Gump, and even Schindler's List!!! And you don't like the movie?!? Wow... Shows what you know about movies isn't worth knowing!

From: Robert St. James (webmaster@rjames.com)

Star Wars was pretty cool. The Empire's Got Back was *really* cool. And Return of the Jedi was almost cool, until those f**king teddy bears showed up. However, I think you have to seperate the movies from the the merciless hype (how New Critical of me) that accompanies them now. I hated the re-merchandizing of Star Wars so much that I could scream. Over and over (in the USA at least) we had stupid commercials with their "Star Wars Special Edition!!" crap and the endless repackaging of these movies (now over 20 years old) as if they were something *new*. F**k that. It was like having a little Darth Vader doll rammed up your **** over and over until you confessed that indeed, the Force was with you, in fact, you could not seperate yourself from the Force. What truly pissed me off was the way the merchandizers and Hollywood Hypsters convinced the general public that these tired old flicks that they'd seen dozens of times on cable were actually new and fresh. What makes me twitch in my sleep is that it *worked*. Lines around the block to see a movie you could rent for 99 cents at King Soopers. Sad. Even sadder is that we will be seeing exactly the same thing repeated for Star Trek, ET, and some cruel day -- "Titanic". Yuck.

From: Nick (woytha@juno.com)

To appreciate Star Wars, you need an imagination. To degrate Star Wars is to reveal that you have no imagination. Life would suck without an imagination, that's how I see it.

From: eddy (lobotimy@aol.com)

well, i wonder if this review is too old to respond to, but i just found this site.....so here goes! by the way, hearing someone call u a fucking bitch is awful, but the its your fucking destiny to like it cant be beat. i actually LOVE starwars, which, being a almost 20-something MALE , probably really really surprises u! i dunno....it just has more PASSION to me than stuff, like say, star trek does.... but i can understand what u meant about the my-boyfriend-loves-it-so-i-have-to-see-it thing.... what can i say???? i had gotten an old girlfriend into it awhile back, after she was bent on dismissing it as childish crap. but maybe theres just the overall appeal is something only males could actually apprreciate (not that there arent any female fans). i dunno.... u have to admit--its a guy movie, for whatever that means; wriiten buy a male with boyhood fantasies , inspired by boyhood shows. this is probably all irrelevant (pretend this si intelligent)...but just on my mind. im really hungry right now....so i cant really be anymore articulate than this. thanx ;]

From: Rebecca Wan (artp6143@leonis.nus.edu.sg)

In reply to Nick at woytha@juno.com; With respect, I think the point I was trying to make in my review was that the film STAR WARS *lacks* imagination. I'm not saying I didn't like the film. I did like it, sort of. But on watching it twenty years later, it just doesn't seem to be all that. I feel it's dull *because* it lacks imagination. I don't have the reference with me, but I believe George Lucas has gone on record citing the influence Joseph Campbell has had on his writing STAR WARS, with his theory of using archetypes to construct narratives. However, the downside of re-fashioning archetypes so that an audience will recognize heros and other "types" is that, like many Hollywood movies, plots become familiar and marketable products. They become repetitive because they are intended to be easy to identify (and to identify with). They don't make you think much. They lack imagination. But then, of course, who wants to think at the movies?? So now we bring in style, art direction, technical thingies. Sure, in that area STAR WARS is impressive. STAR WARS is sure cool, but I don't think it's a good film in terms of narrative or direction. We could all get on our knees and worship it because of its deified place in pop cultural history, which is what I feel a lot of critics did at the time of its re-release. We could, and we do, and we might continue to do it. But that's a different direction altogether, isn't it? Thanks for everyone's comments.

From: Golden Earth Girl (goldn_earth_girl@hotmail.com / Friday, December 25, 1998 at 09:51:52)

Like you said, you're entitled to your own opinion. I don't want to sound like a boat movie (AKA "Titanic") freak, so i'll look at both sides of this. Sure, there are a lot of Star Wars products out there, but without them, where would Star Wars fans spend their hard-earned money? I am a HUGE Star Wars fan, and I've seen it so many times i could start quoting it at the drop of a pin. This movie is my favourite because the minor characters are developed almost as much as the main characters (my fave character has always been Wedge Antilles, AKA Red Two at the Battle of Yavin.) This movie embodies the everlasting struggle between good and evil, but sets the stage "a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away..." what more could one ask for? And also, many of today's Star Wars fans, like me, never saw it in theatres the first time around. There IS a difference between sitting down one evening and popping your fave video into the VCR, the dog sniffing at your leg the whole while, and waiting in line with others who love the movie as much as you do to experience the feel of sound that shakes you from your seat, bouncing you into the aisle! I was more than extatic when the special editions were released! I can't wait for episode one! that reminds me... i'd better go get in line! 'Till May '99!

From: JAMES RESNICK (JAMESRESNICK36@YAHOO.COM / Thursday, March 18, 1999 at 02:28:26)


From: flaed (flaed11@aol.com / Wednesday, May 19, 1999 at 12:26:23)

Didn't realize it was all about you! Get over it.......

From: ( / Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 01:35:23)


From: Martin Al varez (jmam@infosel.com / Saturday, July 17, 1999 at 05:07:11)

My dear Rebecca: I saw your article about Star Wars today for first time. I was looking for some information about a German movie named "Run Lorna, Run". Anyway, I saw your comments about the movie. First of all, let me tell you that I am GREAT STAR WARS FAN, but don’t be scared I am not going to say nasty things (but I have to confess that I thought about some when I began to read your article.) First of all let me congratulate you for having the courage of putting yourself in the eyesight of all us SW fans. I am sure that you knew what your comments will bring up. Man, you need guts! I am not going to handle the movie in the story and it's context, simply because I won't be objective. I love the whole story. I am going to talk of it by the production side (not the dark side ehh) I respect your opinion, and I had to admit that... 1.- George Lucas was a very Young director, and movie has a lot of bloopers plus a lot of time-place errors. 2.- That the marketing machine has been taken advantage of SW for more than two decades (and the worst of all… we love it!) But in the other hand, if you criticize a movie with more than 20 years old, you need to focus your mind in the technology available, the social issues and the ideas. You are trying to criticize SW like someone who is used to see the Simpsons and then change the channel and begins to see the Flinstones, or the Brady Bunch. Obviously you will think that those two 60's series are lame and they lack of action. You understand what I mean? Imagine that you are going to make a review of "Gone with the wind", or "The Ten Commandments". You need to focus in another time (The cold war, America before the Vietnam, etc.) _ My child, it is the same. So please be careful when you are going to talk about something you are not prepared to talk about. Best Regards Martin