|
>dance 10 by frontier danceland >reviewed by malcolm tay >date:
26 nov 2002 >tired
already? go home then |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This year, Frontier Danceland commemorated its tenth anniversary with a two-night run of DANCE 10, reviving six dances - all but one by co-founder and artistic director, Low Mei Yoke - from previous years. In between, video clips of excerpts from earlier works, as well as behind-the-scenes footage, were shown in all their hissing, imperfect splendour. As a Chinese-educated Singaporean, Low is interested in the tension she feels between past and present, East and West, tradition and modernity. In expanding the range of Chinese dance with ballet steps and contemporary floorwork - and in trying to put everything together in an artfully coherent fashion - these conflicting dualities are physically realised in her choreography. This tension can also be depicted in other ways, as we see in the opening 'Prelude', by having some dancers in traditional Chinese garb and others in street clothes. Putting on imaginary make-up, mumbling quietly to themselves at times, they try out various movement combinations in preparation for the rest of the evening. Set to Peking opera songs, 'Golden Lotus Feet', one of two works from 1991 on the programme, deals with the grim fate of ancient Chinese women. Its contrasting images are effective; its conclusion is dramatic, if somewhat predictable. Long loops of white fabric, suggestive of the strips of cloth traditionally used in foot binding, hang gloomily in the background. Wearing the special lotus shoes made for bound feet, four coy maidens in brocade costumes sidestep delicately across the stage with a hankie and a silk fan in each hand. Four barefooted girls in blue, unwittingly drawn to these pretty bound-feet women, trail their every move; and yet, they also like the sound of their own bare feet stamping, squeaking against the ground. Eventually, the four girls meet their end, their flaccid bodies dangling in the hanging strips of cloth. |
||
|
>>'As a Chinese-educated Singaporean, Low is interested in the tension she feels between past and present, East and West, tradition and modernity.' |
'Crossing' (1998) is a work most plain. For much of the dance, three dancers, who take turns holding an umbrella, move from one end of the stage to the other very slowly. Alone or in twos, they walk forwards and sideways, the length of their stride exaggerated by the slowing of time. When they do meet, their interactions are brief, caught momentarily in a lift or rolling over each other, fleeting bits of contact that are impersonal at best. As a distillation of contemporary life, its simplicity is charming, even when it begins to test your patience after a while. Street performer Lin Jian Quan, who specialises in the three-stringed instrument, accompanied 'Crossing' on stage, his tireless strumming a constant companion to his unwavering Hokkien song. |
|
|
The evening ended with 'Vanishing ', which I saw at its premiere in 2000. The musical impetus is Vanessa Mae's 'Happy Valley', composed in 1997 to celebrate Hong Kong's re-unification with China. After a few rounds of marching across the stage, eleven women tear off their long-sleeved shirts and neckties to begin a most joyful group dance in their sparkly halter-tops. They just looked so happy twirling their beaded red hankies - it's a sight that could put anyone in a good mood. Two years ago, I observed the dance as a comment on female gender roles (my companion at that time still finds this view extremely hilarious), but now, I think it hints at something less specific. My only misgiving about DANCE 10 lay with Choo Tee Kuang's 'Not That I Don't Understand' (1996). Six dancers in a row vigorously shaking their heads and wagging their fingers to the accompanying Chinese-rock track - that is the only impression I'm left with, and it isn't the most compelling of images. Whatever the reasons for programming this piece - perhaps it was the most convenient to restage at the time - it didn't seem like a decent representative of the body of work made for the group by guest choreographers. Dances, unlike
paintings or audio recordings, can't be accessed at our own leisure; every
performance is an intense collaborative effort that vanishes the moment
it ends. It's for this reason alone that I think retrospectives like DANCE
10 are important to our dance heritage - even when it turns out bad. I
hope we don't have to wait for another ten years before Frontier Danceland
or any other dance company revives an old work. |
||